Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews: Home

What is a Systematic Review?

"A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view to minimizing bias, thus providing more reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made (Antman 1992, Oxman 1993). The key characteristics of a systematic review are:

1. A clearly stated set of objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies;

2. An explicit, reproducible methodology;

3. A systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility criteria;

4. An assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies, for example through the assessment of risk of bias; and

5. A systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies."

-Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org.

Other Review Types

A literature review is an assessment of a body of research that addresses a specific topic or research question. Also called a narrative review, this type of review has a wide scope and uses a non-standardized methodology. The search strategies, comprehensiveness, and time range covered will vary and do not follow an established protocol.

A scoping review often addresses a broader research question and can be used as preparation for a systematic review. The purpose of this type of review is to find all available information on a certain topic in order to identify gaps in the published and unpublished literature.

A mixed methods review is a systematic review that synthesizes two or more types of data (often quantitative and qualitative). This method of review is useful for multidisciplinary research questions or as a way to address the same overlapping or complementary review questions.

An umbrella review is, simply put, a review of systematic reviews written on a certain research topic. In order to maintain the highest level of research, only systematic reviews and meta-analyses are included in an umbrella review.

Instruction and Research Librarian

Profile Photo
Elizabeth Hinton
Due to COVID-19, virtual consultations are available by appointment only. Please email me to schedule a time.
Contact:
601-984-1239